Re: residuation for compositional search?

From: Antonio Regidor García <a_regidor_at_yahoo.es>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 08:19:45 +0100 (BST)

--- El mar, 14/6/11, Sebastian Fischer <mail_at_sebfisch.de> escribió:

> The Curry report does not predate a specific interleaving
> of
> concurrent constraints but only proposes PAKCS's behaviour
> as one
> possible sequential implementation. I also did not find
> any
> termination guarantees so it's hard to call any behaviour a
> bug, I
> think.

Shouldn't (a & b) be semantically equivalent to (b & a)?

Regards,

Antonio Regidor García

_______________________________________________
curry mailing list
curry_at_lists.RWTH-Aachen.DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/curry
Received on Di Jun 14 2011 - 09:25:00 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Do Dez 12 2019 - 07:15:10 CET